Limerick City Church
Facebook Page
  • Limerick City Church
    • Who We Are
    • Where we meet
    • Leadership >
      • The Task of Leadership
      • The Need for Leadership
    • When we meet
    • What We Believe
    • Testimonies >
      • What is Life all About?
      • Margaret
  • Sermons
    • Sermon Series >
      • Book of Acts
      • Choose Your Church
      • The Faith of Abraham
      • Fruit of the Spirit
      • Christian's Warfare
      • The Healthy Church
      • B.H. Clendennen
      • How to Judge
      • Grace in Jonah
      • The New Wineskin
      • The Uniqueness of the Bible
      • Strange Trials
      • The Prayer Closet
      • Mighty Conversions
      • Various 2013-14 Limerick sermons
      • Sanctification of the Spirit
      • Lot's Journey to Sodom
      • Wisdom for the Wise
      • 2015 Limerick Ireland
      • Redeeming the Time
      • Mary Limerick Malcomson
      • Salvation by Faith
      • The Ministry of Christ
      • Temptation
      • 2016 Sermons Limerick
      • Genesis 1-10
      • Rebuilding the Gates Nehemiah
      • The Shadow of the Cross
      • The Blood of Jesus
      • Unity in the Church
      • My Testimony
      • A Man Under Authority
      • Authority & Submission
      • Various 2017
      • Justification by Faith
      • Born Again
      • The Church
      • The Gifts of the Spirit
      • Various 2018
      • Jerusalem and Bible Prophecy
      • How to Store up Treasures in Heaven
      • How to Hear
      • Is this the Last Generation?
      • The Divine Exchange at the Cross
      • Water Baptism
      • School of Christ Convention 2018
      • The Latter Rain Covenant
      • The Marriage Covenant
      • Lost Things
      • Genesis 24
      • The Fight of Faith
      • 2019 Sermons LCC
      • Assurance of Salvation
      • Missing Links
      • Prayer
      • The Bible
      • Psalm 119
      • Grace Gifts
      • Various 2020
      • 2020 Vision
      • Battle for the Mind
      • Blood of Everlasting Covenant
      • Christ in the Crisis
      • The Corona Crisis
      • Czech Republic Page >
        • Czech 1
      • Biblical Teaching of Head Covering
      • Christ the Healer
      • Reaching Cults for Christ >
        • Candace healing testimonies
        • New Page 1
        • New Page
        • Ladies Meeting
        • Importance of church
        • Rest in the Lord
        • New Page
        • Birthday
        • Candace May 21
        • Shona test
      • Wise & Foolish Virgins
      • God's Message in an Evil Hour
      • Biblical Love
      • The Great Reset
      • Witchcraft in the Church
      • Joseph: A Vessel of Recovery
      • LCC sermons 2021
      • The Heaven's Rule
      • The Blood of Jesus & The Last Days
      • Spiritual Warfare
      • The Centrality of Christ
      • The Battle for the Mind Vol.2
      • SOC 2021
      • Raising Children Under Rising Tyranny
      • The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse
      • London Conference
      • The 21st Century Church
      • The Advocate & the Accuser
      • Various 2022
      • Little Things of Scripture
      • Russia, Magog & Tarshish
      • A Heart for God
      • Social Justice & the Gospel
      • A Vessel of Revival
      • Ruin, Redemption & Regeneration
      • Candace Malcomson >
        • Candace Malcomson Funeral
        • Candace Testimonies
        • Candace Malcomson Bible Studies
        • Candace Worship & Songs
        • Candace Children's Talk
        • Candace Written Articles >
          • Christian Romance Novels
          • Christliche Romane. ROMANTISCHE ROMANE
          • Worship and Contemporary Christian Music
      • Sof
      • The Four Seasons of Life
      • Providence in the Book of Ruth
      • Daily Devotions
      • The God of the Valleys
      • Penal Substitution
    • Latest News
    • Articles >
      • Great Commission
      • Christ the Creator
      • Repentance
      • Jesus The Preacher
      • Missionary Churches
      • Leadership
      • Fasting
      • Unity in the Church
      • The Prayer Closet
      • GOD'S DWELLING PLACE IN EPHESUS
      • Things God Hates
      • CAN CHRISTIANS BE INDWELT BY DEMONS?
      • German
    • Books
  • Missions
    • Missionaries
    • Limerick Bible School
    • Encouraging Links
  • Blog
  • Contact LCC
    • Donate Page
    • LCC Events

CHRONICLE  I.
THE HOLY EUCHARIST
Eating the Flesh of Deity

One might wonder why, in a scriptural expose of the doctrines of the Catholic Church, I would choose this subject The Roman Interpretation of the Lord's Supper (more commonly known as "Communion") for the first of the "Catholic Chronicles." Most Protestants (today, Protestants  are considered to be members of any church or church-group outside the Roman  Catholic or Eastern Orthodox churches) would expect me to deal with what they might consider the more obvious departures from biblical foundation such as the  worship of and prayers to the Virgin Mary, the infallibility of the pope, purgatory and prayers for the dead, the history of the torture and burning of  accused "heretics" and such like that, and no doubt in future installments we  shall look in-depth at each of these.

But for this first article I believe that we should get right to the root, before we begin exploring the branches of Roman Doctrine and practice. And any Catholic who has even a small  knowledge of his church knows that the central focus of each gathering (known as  the "mass") is the Holy Eucharist.


"THE EUCHARIST"

The word  "Eucharist" is a Greek word that means "thanksgiving". In the gospel accounts of the Last Supper, Jesus is described as "giving thanks" before breaking the bread  (Luke 22:19), and so this word became a proper name for the Lord's Supper in the early Catholic Church. Today, it is more commonly associated with the elements in communion, especially the host or "wafer", although the ceremony itself is  still called "The Holy Eucharist".

Now, you might be wondering why I'm  taking so much time and effort to explain something as harmless as the ceremony  known around the world as communion. If you've ever been to church at all,  (Protestant or Catholic), you've probably taken part in a communion service. So why make all this fuss about bread and wine? Why? Because that's where the  similarity between evangelical communion services and the Roman Catholic Mass  ends - at the bread and the wine!


"TRANSUBSTANTIATION"

That 18-letter word above is a complete theological statement…and the name of a doctrine, out of which springs the most astounding set of beliefs and practices that has ever been taught in the name of religion. Very, very few people know what the Catholic Church actually believes and teaches concerning this subject. and I am convinced  that even fewer Catholics realize themselves what they are taking part in. From  earliest childhood, "This is the body of Christ" is all they've ever heard when  the priest gingerly placed the wafer on their tongue. And as they grew up it was so natural and part of normal religious life, that their minds never even  questioned the fact that Jesus Christ, Himself, was actually in their  mouth!

It might be hard for you to believe, but that's exactly, literally, what "transubstantiation" means. The Roman Catholic Church teaches their flocks that  the bread and the wine used in the Mass actually, physically, turns into the  flesh and blood of Jesus Christ after the priest blesses it during the liturgy (ceremony). Although this in itself might shock you, it is really only the  beginning. For the implications and practical conclusions of this doctrine are  absolutely mind-boggling.


"EXCLUSIVE AUTHORITY"

For example, the Roman Church teaches that since their priests are the only ones who have the authority from God to pronounce the blessing which changes the elements of  communion into the actual body and blood of Jesus, that they are the only church where Jesus "physically resides" even now! Let me quote a letter written to one  of the girls in our ministry from a devoted Catholic:

"To explain the Catholic Church would take volumes, but basically the Catholic Church was  founded by Jesus Christ when He was here on earth. It is the only church founded  by Jesus. The greatest asset of our church is that we have Jesus present in the  Holy Eucharist. He is really here, body, soul and divinity. He is God and in His omnipotence can do anything He wishes, and He decided to remain with us until  the end of the world in the form of the host (the "wafer") in Holy  Communion."

If you think this is just the isolated opinion of someone on  the fringe of the church, or that the Catholic Church as a whole does not really believe or teach this, I beg you to read on. For not only is this the official teaching of Rome, but according to irreversible church decree (called dogma), anyone who does not hold to this belief, in the most explicit detail, is accursed and damned forever!
Picture
"THE  COUNCIL OF TRENT"

When Europe was electrified by the eloquent preaching of the sixteenth century Reformation, the Roman Catholic hierarchy gathered together. Her theologians worked for three decades on the preparation of a statement of faith concerning  transubstantiation. This document remains, to this day, the standard of Catholic  doctrine.

As the Second Vatican Council commenced in 1963, Pope John  XXIII declared, "I do accept entirely all that has been decided and declared at  the Council of Trent". What did the Council of Trent decide and  declare? Some of the first sections are as follows:

Canon I: "If any one shall deny that the body and blood, together with the soul and divinity of our Lord Jesus Christ, and therefore entire Christ, are truly, really, and  substantially contained in the sacrament of the most Holy Eucharist; and shall  say that He is only in it as a sign, or in a figure, let him be  accursed!"

Canon II: "If any one shall say that the substance of the bread  and wine remains in the sacrament of the most Holy Eucharist, together with the  body and blood of our Lord Jesus Christ...let him be accursed!"

Canon III: "If any one shall say that Christ, the only begotten Son of God, is not to be adored in the holy sacrament of the Eucharist, even with the open worship of Latria, and therefore not to be venerated with any peculiar festal celebrity, nor to be solemnly carried about in processions according to the praiseworthy and universal rites and customs of the Holy Church, and that He is not to be  publicly set before the people to be adored, and that His adorers are idolaters - let him be accursed!"


"THE WORSHIP OF THE HOST"

"You shall not  make unto you any engraved image...You shall not bow down yourself to them, nor serve them..." The 2nd commandment (Ex.20:4-5). "God is spirit, and  those who worship Him must worship in spirit and truth." John 4:23.

In Canon VI, a rite of worship called "Latria" was spoken of. This is not just an "ancient custom", it is thoroughly practiced today in every Mass. After the bread has  been supposedly "changed" into Christ by the priest, it is placed in a holder called the monstrance. And before this monstrance the Catholic must bow and worship (this act is called "genuflecting") the little wafer as God! Sometimes they have processions where they solemnly march, as the congregation bows and offers praise and worship to this piece of bread!

The Roman teaching that Jesus Christ is physically present in each morsel of bread creates many other doctrinal and practical problems. For instance, when the service is over, what happens to all those leftover wafers that have been "changed into Christ"? Do they change back into bread again when the priest goes home? I'm afraid not. For  according to Canon IV of the Council of Trent, they stay flesh! And don't think that 400 year-old decree is just some dusty old manuscript in a museum case somewhere. It still is completely adhered to and passionately practiced.

As an  example, here is a passage from an official Catholic home instruction book, copyrighted 1978: "Jesus Christ does not cease to exist under the appearances of bread and wine after the Mass is over. Furthermore some hosts are usually kept in all Catholic churches. In these hosts, Jesus is physically and truly present, as long as the appearances of bread remain. Catholics therefore have the praiseworthy practice of 'making visits' to our Lord present in their churches to offer Him their thanks, their adoration, to ask for help and forgiveness; in a word, to make Him the center around which they live their daily lives." ("The Spirit of Jesus" Catholic Home Study Instruction Course, Book #3, p.92.) That is an incredible interpretation of how to make Jesus the center of your daily life!


"WHEN DID THIS TEACHING BEGIN?"

The teaching of transubstantiation does not date back to the Last Supper as most Catholics suppose. It was a controversial topic for many centuries before officially  becoming an article of faith (which means that it is essential to salvation according to Rome). The idea of a physical presence was  vaguely held by some, such as Ambrose, but it was not until 831 A.D. that Paschasius Radbertus, a Benedictine Monk, published a treatise openly advocating  the doctrine. Even then, for almost another four centuries, theological war was  waged over this teaching by bishops and people alike, until at the Fourth Lateran Council in 1215 A.D., it was officially defined and canonized as a dogma, (A "Dogma" is a teaching or doctrine that can never be reversed or repealed. It is equal in authority to the Bible), by Pope Innocent III.

Church historians tell us that when this doctrine first began to be taught in the Middle Ages, that the priests took great care that no crumb should fall lest the body of Jesus be hurt, or even eaten by a mouse or a dog! There were quite serious discussions as to what should be done if a person were to vomit after receiving the sacrament. At the Council of Constance, it was argued that if a communicant spilled some of the blood on his beard, both beard and the man should be destroyed by burning! (The Other Side of Rome, p.21) (By the end of  the eleventh century, lest someone should spill God's blood, some in the church began to hold back the cup from the people, and finally in 1415, the Council of  Constance officially denied the cup to laymen. Although today, by decree of the Vatican, churches may now offer the  cup optionally to communicants.)

Picture
"HOW ROME VIEWS THE  BIBLE"

Before we  proceed to look at what the Bible has to say on this subject, it is important to understand the official Catholic view of the Scriptures. According to  unquestionable decree, they hold that "Church tradition has equal authority with  the Bible." This is not just a theological view, but it was made an article of faith by the same Council of Trent in 1545! And again, this view is completely held by the Church today:

"The teachings of the Church will always be in  keeping with the teachings of the Scripture…and it is through the teaching of the Church that we understand more fully truths of sacred Scripture. To the  Catholic Church belongs the final word in the understanding and meaning of the  Holy Spirit in the words of the Bible."

And explaining the premise used in interpreting the Bible: "...usually the meaning of the Scriptures is sought out by those who are specially trained for this purpose. And in their conclusions, they know that no explanation of the Scriptures which contradicts the truths constantly taught by the infallible Church can be true." ("The Spirit  of Jesus" Catholic Home Study Instruction Course, Book #3, p.94-95.)

Any thinking person can see how such a mode of interpretation can  be dangerously used to manipulate Scripture to mean absolutely anything at all!  Who has not observed this of the various cults? The Moonies, Mormons, and  Jehovah's Witnesses all back up their false teachings with "new revelations" and "inspired interpretations" of the Scriptures each claiming that the Holy Spirit revealed these new truths to their founders. One opens themselves to all kinds of deception when they judge the Bible by what their church or pastor teaches, instead of judging what their church or pastor teaches by the  Bible!


"CATHOLIC PROOF-TEXTS EXPLAINED"

With this in  mind, we will briefly discuss the two main passages of Scripture that the Roman Church uses while trying to show that Jesus Himself, taught  transubstantiation. John 6:54-55: "He who eats My flesh and drinks My blood has eternal life; and I will raise him up on the last day. For My flesh is  true food, and My blood is true drink."

Catholics are taught here, that Jesus is explaining how He is literally offering them His flesh and blood, so  that they may have eternal life by physically eating Him. With just a little study of the whole passage (vs. 27-71), it is clear that Jesus was not talking  about physical, but spiritual food and drink.

Food is eaten to satisfy hunger. And in verse 35 Jesus says, "He who comes to Me shall never hunger." Now, Jesus is not promising eternal relief from physical hunger pains. He is, of course, speaking of the spiritual hunger in man for righteousness and salvation. And He promises to those who will "come to Him" that He will satisfy their hunger for these things forever therefore, to come to Him is to "eat"! (See also  Matt.5:6, 11:28, John 4:31-34.)

We drink also to satisfy thirst, and again in verse 35 Jesus tells us, "He that believes on Me shall never thirst." Therefore, to believe on Him is to "drink"! (See also John 4:13-14.) No one can say that here Jesus was establishing the eating and drinking of His literal flesh and blood to give eternal life, for in verse 63 He says, "It is the Spirit  who gives life; the flesh profits nothing; the words that I speak unto you, they  are spirit, and they are life." Thus Jesus makes clear what we should be eating  and drinking to have eternal life! (See also Matt.4:4.)

Matt. 26:26 and 28: "This is My body...this is My blood." Catholics base their whole religious system on their interpretation of these two verses. They adamantly  teach that right here, Jesus is pronouncing the first priestly blessing that mysteriously changes the bread and wine into His body and blood. The absolute folly of such a conclusion is proved by this one observation: He was literally  still there before, during, and after they had partaken of the bread and the cup! He was not changed into some liquid and bread - His flesh was still on His bones, and His blood still in His veins. He had not vanished away to reappear in  the form of a piece of bread or a cup of wine!

Let's look closer at His words. No one can deny that here we have figurative language. Jesus did not say touto  gignetai ("this has become" or "is turned into"), but touto esti ("this  signifies, represents" or "stands for") (the New Testament was written in  Greek). It is obvious that Jesus' meaning was not literal but symbolic! And He  wasn't the first in the Bible to claim figuratively that a glass of liquid was really "blood."

One time, David's friends heard him express a strong  desire for water from the well of Bethlehem. In spite of extreme danger, these men broke through the enemy lines of the Philistines and brought the water to him. When David found out that these men had risked their lives in this way, he refused to drink the water, exclaiming, "Is not this the blood of the men who went in jeopardy of their lives?" (II Sam.23:17).

Throughout the gospels we find similar metaphorical language: Jesus referring to Himself as "the Door", "the Vine", "the Light", "the Root", "the Rock", "the Bright and Morning Star", as well as "the Bread". The passage is written with such common language that it is plain to any observant reader that the Lord's Supper was intended  primarily as a memorial and in no sense a literal sacrifice. "Do this in remembrance of Me" (Luke 22:19). 


"TRUE PAGAN ORIGINS"

Where did this  teaching and practice really come from? Like many of the beliefs and rites of Romanism, transubstantiation was first practiced by pagan religions. The noted historian Durant said that belief in transubstantiation as practiced by the  priests of the Roman Catholic system is "one of the oldest ceremonies of  primitive religion" (The Story of Civilization, p.741). The syncretism and  mysticism of the Middle East were great factors in influencing the West,  particularly Italy. (Roman Society from Nero to Marcus Aurelius, by Dill). In Egypt, priests would consecrate food cakes which were supposed to become the flesh of Osiris! (an ancient Egyptian god of the lower world and judge of the dead - Encyclopedia of Religions, Vol. 2, p.76). The idea of transubstantiation was also characteristic of the religion of Mithra whose sacraments of cakes and haoma drink closely parallel Catholic Eucharistic rites. (Ibid.) The idea of eating the flesh of deity was most popular among the people of Mexico and Central America long before they  ever heard of Christ; and when Spanish missionaries first landed in those countries, "their surprise was heightened, when they witnessed a religious rite which reminded them of communion…an image made of flour…and after consecration by priests, was distributed among the people who ate it…declaring it was the flesh of deity. (Prescott's Mexico, Vol. 3.)


"SO WHY DO THEY TEACH IT?"

Before concluding our first chronicle, the question needs to be asked, "Why does the Roman Catholic Church need to have such a doctrine. Why do they think that Jesus needs them to physically eat Him? That is what truly puzzled me as I read astounded  through the catechism and doctrinal instruction books. But the answer to that  question is not a pretty one. As I said before, the implications and practical conclusions of the teaching of transubstantiation are substantially worse than the doctrine itself and like a great web spun by an industrious spider, Rome's teachings spiral out from this central hub like the spokes of a wheel.

In the following Catholic Chronicle we will look intently at the next direct result of transubstantiation in official Catholic systematic theology: "The Sacrifice of the Mass."